Digital verification services sometimes want to use “data brokers” for this purpose and we’ve been asked how they should be treated.
We’ve been asked variously for some kind of document with a gap analysis or assimilation matrix. We don't have one. This is why.
You want to tell people that your service is certified and on the GOV.UK register of digital identity and attribute services. What should you say and what shouldn't you?
The final publication of the ‘gamma’ (0.4) UK digital identity and attributes trust framework, and updated supplementary codes are now live on GOV.UK.
This blogpost explains the new approach to certification of white label services against the gamma (0.4) trust framework.
This blogpost explains how service providers who are already certified against the trust framework can ‘uplift’ to the new version.
We recently launched the second year of the inclusion monitoring report survey for certified digital verification services. It is compulsory for services certified against the UK digital identity and attributes trust framework to complete the survey. The purpose of the …
In November, we pre-released the gamma (0.4) publication of the trust framework. We also highlighted that we would be seeking feedback on this latest publication to inform our ongoing work. This post kicks off that engagement cycle, explaining how we …
This blog post takes a closer look at what the new roles in the gamma trust framework do, why we introduced them, and how they support providers looking to get certified against this new publication.
The UK digital identity and attributes trust framework underpins our approach to building trust in the digital identity ecosystem. The requirements it contains help build confidence that services certified against it are reliable and secure. So far, we’ve published three …
